IELTS Writing task 2 – 22/10/2016:Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education

Đề thi IELTS Writing Task 2 ngày 22/10/2016

Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education, and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

Model Answer


It is undoubtedly so that every individual should be entitled to tertiary education, however, subsidizing the tuition fees for every student regardless of their background can be a costly approach, and other considerations should also be taken.

On one hand, some reasons for government backing university students to cover their fees are as follows. Firstly, it is a basic right of human, not a privilege, to quench their thirst for knowledge and expand their outlook on life. Especially, university education is the stage when a student learns most of the knowledge related to their future profession, which means they have to receive it to secure a better job and enjoy a higher standard of living later. Secondly, society can benefit a great deal with a high number of university graduates. With their expertise gained from university, they would become distinguished doctors, engineers or architects. For example, more doctors would help solve more cases of cancer, AIDS or diabetes, resulting in people’s improved physical and mental well-being.

On the other hand, offering this type of financial aid to all students irrespective of their financial condition can be a risky investment. The first reason can be some students are not willing to acquire knowledge, and would just enter university free of charge, which automatically mean that government investment will be fruitless. Secondly, although education is amongst key factors of a country’s growth, other sectors have an equal role to play. Therefore, instead of sponsoring tertiary-level education for all rich or poor learners, 1 think it would be better to lend more support to the studious and determined students, the rest of the budget should be allocated to health care , public facilities and so forth. This addresses the needs of others as well.

In conclusion, while recognizing the role of a free university education system to every student, 1 think that governments need to take into account their own country’s situation avoid ineffectiveness of that policy and ensure that the budget is also spent on other key areas.


Over recent years, more and more people have been attending university and arguments have persisted as to whether students should pay for this privilege not. Although there are convincing arguments on both sides, I strongly believe that it should be free.

One argument put forward in favour of charging students is that education is becoming more expensive to fund as universities grow in size. Consequently, making students pay may maintain standards and ensure the quality of the teaching. In addition, it is argued that most students benefit from university in terms of higher paid jobs, so it is fair that they pay for at least some of the cost, especially given that the majority of students attending university are from the middle classes. Last but not least, in many countries, there is a shortage of people to do manual jobs such as plumbing and carpentry, so making university more expensive may encourage people to take up these jobs.

However, there are a number of arguments in favour of making university education free for all. Firstly, it will encourage more people to attend and this will benefit society. This is because it will lead to a more productive and educated workforce. Research has generally shown that those countries that have a better educated population via university have higher levels of innovation and productivity. In addition, there is the issue of equality of opportunity. If all students are required to pay, those on a low income may be dissuaded from attending, thus making it unfair. The reason for this is that they will likely not be able to secure financial support from their family so they will be concerned about the debts they will incur in the future.

In conclusion, I am of opinion that all education should remain equally available to all regardless of income. This is not only fair, but will also ensure that countries can prosper and develop into the future with a well-educated workforce.


The opinion that every citizen should have the right to study at school or university for free is very controversial one. Those, who disagree, refer to enormous expenditures of government in case of establishing such laws. Although, I hold the viewpoint that not charging people for education could become very beneficial for a country and its economy.

First, young people from poor families could be very smart. Looking back to history and biographies of distinguished people, raised in poverty can illustrate this best. Making schooling available only for fortunate is not fair. Moreover, the state well-being could also be affected, because there would be a lack of talented specialists, whose skills was not discovered and developed by proper training.

Another advantage of making education free of charge is the happiness of the nation. An individual’s inability to collect the amount of money he needs to pay school or university fee cause stress and anxiety in the middle-class society, which can even keep them from having children. Nowadays we can see that the lowest birthrate is in countries where prices of enrollment to highest education institutions are very high. This clearly indicates the fact that citizens of rich countries do not feel able to provide their future offspring proper education.

Finally, nothing seems to be more beneficial to a country’s economy than an educated and intelligent nation. Free courses and study programs can prepare excellent specialists, who would work to bring profit themselves and hence their country. That would surely compensate most expenses of state budget caused by education of no charge.

To sum up, even though making all schools free can be very expensive for a state’s economy, advantages are invaluable. After several years such improvements would bring fruits of happy, intelligent nation confident about its future.


There are some that argue university education should be available to all and be provided freely by the government. While free tertiary education to all students regardless of financial circumstances may impose burden on governmental tax revenue, I agree that university studies should be provided for free as it can result in the whole society as beneficiary.

On the one hand, tertiary education should not be free as not all citizens wish to attend universities or require degrees. Some professional fields in administration or hospitality do not need tertiary qualifications and many people may not choose to pursue a degree. For these citizens, it would be very unfair if they contribute a portion of their income to taxes that covers the study cost for all tertiary students. Thus, university education should not be made free for all students.

On the other hand, university studies should be made free for all students as it benefits society as a whole. Having free tertiary education would encourage more students of all financial backgrounds to attend universities, which will result in a well-educated society and productive workforce. For instance, Japan has one of the highest number of tertiary qualified citizens and have demonstrated higher levels of innovation and productivity in fields like car manufacturing and technology. If university education is accessible at no cost, there is no doubt that society will reap these benefits.

Whilst it is unjust for a portion of citizens that do not require or do not desire tertiary degrees, I agree wholeheartedly that free university education would benefit society as a whole, as previously mentioned. Having a majority of citizens that have specialised fields of knowledge would inadvertently result in a very productive and thriving workforce that can benefit a nation’s development and economy. Because of this, governments should provide free tertiary education.

In conclusion, whilst free university education may not be advantageous to all citizens, I believe that it should be granted by governments, access to tertiary studies for everyone can result in prolific work forces and well-educated

17 Tháng Năm, 2017

3 responses on "IELTS Writing task 2 – 22/10/2016:Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education"

  1. Everybody has the right to be educated, hence they believe that government should make higher education become accessible for all people by making it free. In my opinion, however, I partly disagree with them.
    First of all, financial pressure on universities is vital if the government remove the tuition fees. This leads to the lack of teachers’ salaries and the unpayable cost of improving the university facilities. This will undoubtedly be a responsibilities of the government as they are the ones who put the financial issues on the universities. Secondly, if the tuition fees are removed and all students can access it, the quality of the student output can not be guaranteed. For example, university administrators are unable to deal with the overwhelming number of students which can be a good opportunity for students to play truant, leading to the poor output as they don’t gain any knowledge while at university.
    On the other hand, allow students to have no tuition fees in university regarding their financial background can be a great encouragement for students. For examples, students who are from poor family have remarkable achievement in study now can access higher education without any difficulty in financial issues. This is a very good sign in education indeed.
    In conclusion, government should take both of the advantage and disadvantage of removing tuition fees into consideration before deciding that whether university education is free or not.

  2. Education plays an important role in each person’s life, especially university education. However, with some people, it is too expensive for them to access to university. That is the reason why there have some opinions that education at the university level should be free for all students who could be rich or poor. In my opinion, i partly agree with this view. Following that, i am going to give my point of view about the idea.
    There are some positive affects when the studying at university is uncharged. The students who cannot afford learning fee can have a chance to continue the studying. They can have higher oppotunity to achieve their dreams and their lives will be better. Moreover, the educational level of society will increase because all people have college degree.
    On the other hand, free university education can have some disadvantages. If the students pay nothing for the studying, the government may not have enough budget to run thousands of universities like nowaday. That is because the amount of fee for the teaching activities such as hiring lecturers, buying facilities for practical course,… is extrememly high. Another problems is that the higher number of graduated students, the lower the chance for applied a job. The result is that the number of unemployment jumps up and the rate of GDP declines.
    In conclusion, i think free educational fee should be applied for people who are poor but they want to continue their studying so that the teaching would not be waste. Society wil have more talent people.

  3. Entering university is the shortest and fastest way to the success. Thus, people believe that this is the true interest of every person and government should support them by exempting all tuition fees for all rich or poor people. However, in my opinion, government should assist students who were not brought up wealthy families.
    On the one hand, making studying in university free can create a huge opportunity for poor students. Firstly, young people from poor families could be smart. Supporting university learners by covering their fees encourages them to study. Thus, money for learning is not a burden for their family anymore. Secondly, government can create a fair treatment for everyone, especially job opportunity after their granduation. Poor and rich students can study in the same invironment with the same treatment.
    On the other hand, supporting this type of financial aid to all students can impose a burden for government’s budget. Universities need money to maintain activities such as paying lecturers’ salary, services and equipment cost. Instead of sponsoring for both poor and rich learners, government can spend money for other activities such as health care, public facilities. Moreover, wealthy learners who have ability to pay tuition fee can study well without any supporter. Let them pay and government can do other works.
    In conclusion, leaders of nations should make more funds that assist tuition fee for poor students and good quality learners instead of paying university fee for all people. It is also s motivation to encourage others to study to take schoolarship.

Leave a Message

Website này sử dụng Akismet để hạn chế spam. Tìm hiểu bình luận của bạn được duyệt như thế nào.

© Copyright 2016, All rights reserved